TOP H4831SC LOAD DATA SECRETS

Top h4831sc load data Secrets

Top h4831sc load data Secrets

Blog Article

This really is designed to be the "check out" powder-or darn near it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge 1 could handload. It is actually the foundation for a lot of pet loads, nevertheless I have not been pleased with the final results.

They are really precisely the same factor, but H4831 sc is Slash shorter so it will eventually pack into a circumstance less difficult then the conventional, and sometimes like our 7mm rem mag it will allow us to add a lot more powder then just the conventional H4831.

The fact that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is precisely why you are observing bigger velocities obtained with that powder, rather than Anything you've witnessed While using the IMR stuff. Also great powder, but considerably superior suited to slightly smaller sized cases having a bit significantly less ability.

Sure you are able to. They are the exact same actual powder however the SC powder is simply Slice shorter so it meters far better.

INgunner54 said: It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Located a node and shot some teams.

It can be very likely that no additional dialogue is needed, in which circumstance we advise starting a completely new thread. If however you are feeling your response is needed you are able to continue to achieve this.

I have made use of both of those and used the very same charges and possess not been able to convey to any h4831 vs h4831sc noticable variances with overall performance. the SC Model meters a bit smoother is about all. any responses??

excaliber reported: I've identified the precise reverse to be correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally accurate powder in my 300 Acquire Mag.

I've found the precise opposite to become true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally exact powder in my three hundred Get Mag.

[e mail shielded] gn and 115 CT's, I have killed additional Deer with this combo than every one of the rifles I have mixed, Operate up to this nevertheless the sweet place are going to be about 54, I'm a Two Little bit-06 nut and I've some things tat is effective really well for me In case your fascinated

Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, they're fully different powders, with IMR 4831 currently being significantly more quickly than the Hodgdon variants. Never address them as the identical powder, because they most certainly will not be.

The "SC" means Quick Slash. I have never found a difference between both powder dut I do not Feel I might mix them.

Some of the previous Lyman data just stated IMR 4831, which was surplus army powder and now newer h4831sc load data mfg as H4831.

I sawed one in 50 % to discover how thick the jackets were being, and so they ended up easily two times as thick for a fifty-grain hollow level was. Ditto with the 64-grain Electrical power Issue, as these bullets are designed for deer, not prairie canine or woodchucks. You now know everything I find out about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I do not know everything in any way regarding h4831 vs h4831sc the 223. I doubt that you are going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to understand how it goes.

Report this page